The Navan IPO: What the Numbers Say About its Valuation and First-Day Trade

The EV Revolution's Dirty Little Secret: Why Battery Recycling Isn't the Silver Bullet We Were Promised

We've all been sold a very clean, very tidy story about the electric vehicle revolution. It goes like this: we drive our EVs for a decade, and when the battery finally degrades, it’s whisked away to a gleaming facility where 95% of its precious metals—the lithium, cobalt, and nickel—are magically recovered and forged into a new battery. A perfect, closed-loop system. A circular economy that absolves us of the environmental sins of mining. It’s a comforting narrative, one that automakers and a constellation of venture-backed startups are spending billions to promote.

The problem is, the numbers don't add up.

When you peel back the layers of press releases and optimistic investor decks, the story of EV battery recycling isn't one of a mature, functioning industry. It’s a story of a massive, speculative bet on a future that is much further away than anyone wants to admit. Right now, the entire sector is running on aspiration, not reality. And I've looked at enough financial models to know that aspiration doesn't pay the bills for long.

The Inconvenient Economics of a Circle

The foundational premise of any recycling industry is that the recovered material is cheaper or more accessible than its virgin alternative. We recycle aluminum because it takes a staggering 95% less energy than smelting it from bauxite ore. The economic incentive is clear and powerful. For EV batteries, that incentive is murky at best, and at worst, completely inverted.

Today, the actual, all-in cost of extracting battery-grade lithium, cobalt, and nickel from a complex, thousand-pound, high-voltage chemical apparatus is often higher than simply digging it out of the ground. The process is a brutal combination of logistics and chemistry. First, you have to transport a heavy, hazardous brick of a battery pack—a logistical nightmare. Then, you either shred it into a powder called "black mass" or use complex hydrometallurgical processes to dissolve and separate the metals. It’s dangerous, energy-intensive, and technologically complex.

This creates a business model precariously balanced on the volatile prices of the very commodities it produces. If the market price of lithium or cobalt craters—as it has done periodically—the entire economic justification for a recycling plant can evaporate overnight. How can a business be considered a cornerstone of a sustainable future if its viability depends on commodity markets remaining perpetually high? What happens when a new mining technique in Australia or a new brine extraction method in Chile fundamentally lowers the cost of virgin lithium?

The EV battery recycling industry today is like an alchemist’s workshop. It’s a fascinating proof of concept, but it’s not a scaled, economically viable enterprise. It’s an expensive solution in search of a problem that, from a purely market-based perspective, doesn't quite exist yet.

The Great Feedstock Fallacy

This brings us to the core discrepancy in the recycling narrative—a gap so large you could drive a Cybertruck through it. I’m talking about feedstock, the industry term for the raw material to be processed. In this case, that means dead EV batteries.

Companies like Redwood Materials and Li-Cycle are raising and spending billions of dollars to build colossal recycling facilities. You see the drone shots in their promotional videos: sprawling, pristine campuses with gleaming new equipment, ready to process tens of thousands of tons of batteries per year. It all looks incredibly impressive. I’ve seen the projections, the hockey-stick growth charts promising to solve the world’s battery waste problem.

And this is the part of the analysis that I find genuinely puzzling. They've built the factories, but where are the batteries?

The vast majority of the 2.5 million-plus EVs sold in the US over the last decade are still on the road. Their batteries, designed to last for ten to fifteen years, are still working just fine. The first wave of mass-market EVs, like the early Nissan Leafs and Tesla Model S sedans, are only now beginning to trickle into the end-of-life stream. We’re talking about a few thousand vehicles a year—to be more exact, data from 2022 suggests it's closer to 5,000-8,000 units in the US. That’s a rounding error for factories designed for industrial-scale throughput.

So what are these multi-billion-dollar plants recycling right now? The answer is primarily factory scrap from battery gigafactories and a smattering of consumer electronics (a business with its own challenging collection logistics). While valuable, this is not the tsunami of EV packs their business models promised investors. They are essentially operating a pilot program while servicing their debt on a full-scale factory.

This leads to a critical methodological question: can you really extrapolate the costs and efficiencies of recycling uniform, pre-consumer factory scrap to the messy, chaotic, and highly variable world of post-consumer EV packs? An eight-year-old battery from a Chevy Bolt has a different chemistry and degradation level than a five-year-old pack from a Tesla Model 3 (which can contain over 100 pounds of materials). Assuming they are the same from a processing standpoint is a dangerous oversimplification.

Are these companies building for a market that will eventually arrive in the 2030s, or are they creating a compelling narrative to secure funding in the present, hoping against hope that the market catches up before the cash runs out?

A Problem of Timing, Not Technology

Let's be precise. The problem with EV battery recycling isn't the science. The hydrometallurgy is impressive, and achieving 95% material recovery in a lab is a genuine breakthrough. The failure is one of timing and economics. The narrative has been deployed a full decade ahead of the reality.

We are being sold a solution to a problem that won't exist at scale for another 10 years. In the meantime, billions are being spent on infrastructure that is currently starved for the very material it was built to process. The "circular economy" for EVs is a beautiful idea, but right now, it's just a story. The real test will come when the first million-vehicle-a-year cohort of EVs actually retires. Until then, the industry isn't a silver bullet; it's a very expensive placeholder.